Hi Carrie
Thanks for your detailed reply.
Yes, we are on SLES10 TD13.10, will upgrade to SLES11 sometime in the new year, after the 15.0 upgrade.
I have found the Orange book you mentioned, very informative.
I have a question, if tactical workloads are not defined, does that mean that the AWTs assigned to Work08,09,10 will go unused, or with 13.10 do tactical queries go to Work01 ? Or, if Work08,09,10 are active, are they only assigned AWTs if the "Reserved AWTs" are assigned a number > 0 ? If Work08,09,10 are assigned AWTs with the "Reserved AWTs=0", will setting up a tactical workload (single/few amp or CPU < 2 secs) make use of the AWTs at no extra AWT overhead, as we currently get flow control. I will do some analysis, and if the number of queries classifying into the tactical workload is large, then I can assign some reserved AWTs which will be taken from the 62 AWT reserve pool (default 80 AWT).
Another question if you don't mind, is I was also considering increasing the AWTs from 80 to say 90, however we only have 96GB 6650H nodes. I did see on one of your blogs, that this would increase memory on the nodes, I think from memory it would be "30 amps/node x 10 newAWTs x 2 MB = 600 MB/node", which doesn't seem excessive. I can also discuss this with Teradata Customer Services, as the Customer really does not want to invest in additional hardware if at all possible
Cheers
Steven
Hi Carrie
Thanks for your detailed reply.
Yes, we are on SLES10 TD13.10, will upgrade to SLES11 sometime in the new year, after the 15.0 upgrade.
I have found the Orange book you mentioned, very informative.
I have a question, if tactical workloads are not defined, does that mean that the AWTs assigned to Work08,09,10 will go unused, or with 13.10 do tactical queries go to Work01 ? Or, if Work08,09,10 are active, are they only assigned AWTs if the "Reserved AWTs" are assigned a number > 0 ? If Work08,09,10 are assigned AWTs with the "Reserved AWTs=0", will setting up a tactical workload (single/few amp or CPU < 2 secs) make use of the AWTs at no extra AWT overhead, as we currently get flow control. I will do some analysis, and if the number of queries classifying into the tactical workload is large, then I can assign some reserved AWTs which will be taken from the 62 AWT reserve pool (default 80 AWT).
Another question if you don't mind, is I was also considering increasing the AWTs from 80 to say 90, however we only have 96GB 6650H nodes. I did see on one of your blogs, that this would increase memory on the nodes, I think from memory it would be "30 amps/node x 10 newAWTs x 2 MB = 600 MB/node", which doesn't seem excessive. I can also discuss this with Teradata Customer Services, as the Customer really does not want to invest in additional hardware if at all possible
Cheers
Steven