↧
Channel:
Teradata Developer Exchange - Blog activity for carrie's blog
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: Teradata Developer Exchange - Blog activity for carrie's blog
- Channel Number: 4274858
- Language: English
- Registered On: September 10, 2012, 9:21 pm
- Number of Articles: 1058
- Latest Snapshot: June 6, 2019, 4:01 am
- RSS URL: http://developer.teradata.com/blog/carrie/rss.xml
- Publisher: http://downloads.teradata.com/blog/carrie
- Description:
- Catalog: //teradata138.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=4274858
© 2025 //www.rssing.com
Hi Carrie,
I want to start with "Happy New Year" first :)
Coming to my question, sometime back i read your posting on Evaluation Order from TD Magazine. In that you mentioned the order of the workloads may not be a performance concern, but still it is recommendable to have most popular workloads on the top to expect some slight savings. Personally what I realized that the most popular WLs should be on top and WD-Default should be at the end (As WD-Default is for unexpected queries). I saw recently a PRODUCTION Rule set where the number of WLs are around 40. In evaluation order, WD-ConsoleH/M/L/R occupying first 4 places. This is on Enterprise class with SLES10 configuration.
So i just wanted to make my self clear, whether I should bother about having the highly used WLs with strict classification criteria on the top OR not.
Can you please clarify?