↧
Channel:
Teradata Developer Exchange - Blog activity for carrie's blog
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: Teradata Developer Exchange - Blog activity for carrie's blog
- Channel Number: 4274858
- Language: English
- Registered On: September 10, 2012, 9:21 pm
- Number of Articles: 1058
- Latest Snapshot: June 6, 2019, 4:01 am
- RSS URL: http://developer.teradata.com/blog/carrie/rss.xml
- Publisher: http://downloads.teradata.com/blog/carrie
- Description:
- Catalog: //teradata138.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=4274858
© 2025 //www.rssing.com
As always my question is perfectly answered, thank you very much for detailed explanation.
And sorry, i would have clearly mentioned about thorrle delay queue.
It good to know that the throttle delay queue (in Viewpoint under Delayed sessions from query monitor) is different from 'Send, Recieve Delays'.
While focusing on resolution, this is what I am trying to implement.
To get the exact effect with Flowcontrol, I think it is good idea to focuse on FlowControlTime(FCT) instead of FlowControlCount(FCC) based on FlowControlleD (FCD) filed in ResusageSAWT table. Just using shortcut names for easy of explanation.
So before going to analyze on FCT, i will check wither FCD is recorded as 1 or 0. If FCD is 0 the AMP is not in flowcontrol. My question here is,
For one logging period of 600 seconds (10 mints), if FlowControlCnt showing 20 and FlowControlTime=6000 millseconds and FlowControlled=0. So in this case i can ignore even FCT showing 6 seconds?